Is copyright getting in the way of us preserving our history?


Photo by Betsian

There was a very interesting opinion piece by Victor Keegan in the Media Guardian today. It’s worth reading the whole thing of course, but I’ve excerpted it to give you an idea here.

It’s certainly no stretch to see just how this impacts recorded music as much as anything else…

Is copyright getting in the way of us preserving our history?

The issue of copyright is a global nightmare for anyone interested in digital preservation

Historians 100 years hence will have an abundance of source material about how ordinary lives were lived during the 21st century thanks to the unprecedented way we leave traces through websites, email, Twitter and social networks such as Facebook.

Well, that’s the theory. In practice, most of this living history will be discarded in digital dustbins unless something is done about it. We are often told that, thanks to startling improvements in technology, all our personal memories will soon be able to be stored on something the size of a sugar cube. But the granules that make up that sugar cube are widely scattered and difficult if not impossible to recover.

It is reckoned that the average life expectancy of a website is less than 75 days and that at least 10% of UK websites are lost or replaced with new material every six months. These figures come from a statement by the British Library at yesterday’s launch of the UK Web Archive, which will guarantee access in perpetuity to thousands of hand-picked UK websites – some of which might otherwise have faced oblivion.

They include Antony Gormley’s Trafalgar Square Fourth Plinth Project. This involved 2,400 participants, and the live stream by Sky Arts would no longer have existed online from next month had the BL not taken over responsibility for it. Other projects to be preserved for posterity include a record of the Credit Crunch and the 2010 general election.

The British Library has trouble sourcing even the most popular works from the major record labels, who still cite copyright reasons (though institutionalised entropy is probably more to blame) for not routinely making copies available for permanent archiving.

Worse still, the vast majority of the recorded music in the vaults of those labels, the provenance of which could well be unclear or problematic – and the condition of which is both unknown, but certainly deteriorating – is entirely off-limits to the archivists of culture and heritage.

The article ends:

It is sometimes argued that if copyright law is standing in the way of a universal archive then maybe the world’s collective memories should be placed into some kind of escrow account, not to be opened until copyrights have been sorted out or expired. This sounds plausible, but it would act against the worthy principles espoused by the British Library and others that as much as is humanly possible should not just be available but available now.

And if this is true for websites, it’s true also for books. And if it’s true for books, it’s true also for records.

And I would go one step further… and that’s to argue that the case for the digital public archiving of recorded music is of particular urgency – if only because the magnetic tape on which the vast majority of recorded masters reside are falling to pieces as we speak.

Burning the library in slow motion: how copyright extension has banished millions of books to the scrapheap of history

Jamie ‘Public Domain‘ Boyle sez, ‘When Ray Bradbury’s 1953 classic, Fahrenheit 451 was published, it was scheduled to enter the public domain this month — January 1, 2010. But then we changed the law. And Bradbury’s firemen look like pikers compared to the cultural conflagration that ensued. The works may not be physically destroyed — although many of them are; disappearing, disintegrating, or simply getting lost in the vastly long period of copyright to which we have relegated them. But for the vast majority of works and the vast majority of citizens who do not have access to one of our great libraries, they are gone as thoroughly as if we had piled up the culture of the 20th century and simply set fire to it; and all this right at the moment when we could have used the Internet vastly to expand the scope of cultural access. Bradbury’s firemen at least set fire to their own culture out of deep ideological commitment, vile though it may have been. We have set fire to our cultural record for no reason.’

Remember folks, thanks to 11 copyright term extensions in the past 40-some years, more than 98% of all works in copyright are ‘orphaned’ — still in copyright, but no one knows to whom they belong.

But the legal changes introduced in the years after Fahrenheit 451 did more than just extend terms. Congress eliminated the benign practice of the renewal requirement (which had guaranteed that 85% of works and 93% of books entered the public domain after 28 years because the authors and publishers simply didn’t want or need a second copyright term.)

And copyright, which had been an opt-in system (you had to comply with some very minor formalities to get a copyright) became an opt out system (you got a copyright automatically when you ‘fixed’ the work in material form, whether you wanted it or not.) Suddenly the entire world of informal and non commercial culture — from home movies that provide a wonderful lens into the private life of an era, to essays, posters, locally produced teaching materials — was swept into copyright. And kept there for the life of the author plus 70 years.

The effects were culturally catastrophic. Copyright went from covering very little culture, and only covering it for a 28 year period during which it was commercially available, to covering all of culture, regardless of whether it was available — often for over a century. Unlike Fahrenheit 451, the vast majority of the culture swept into this 20th century black hole was not commercially available and, in most cases, the authors are unknown. The works are locked up — with no benefit to anyone — and no one has the key that would unlock them.

We have cut ourselves off from our own culture, left it to molder — and in the case of nitrate film, literally disintegrate — with no benefit to anyone. The works may not be physically destroyed — although many of them are; disappearing, disintegrating, or simply getting lost in the vastly long period of copyright to which we have relegated them.

But for the vast majority of works and the vast majority of citizens who do not have access to one of our great libraries, they are gone as thoroughly as if we had piled up the culture of the 20th century and simply set fire to it; and all this right at the moment when we could have used the Internet vastly to expand the scope of cultural access.

Fahrenheit 451… Book burning as done by lawyers

(Via Boing Boing.)

David Sanjek on philosophy, archives and missing masters

I went to Manchester yesterday to speak with David Sanjek – former head of archives at BMI in the US, now a professor at the University of Salford.

We ended up talking for three hours over coffee and covered everything from the history of music copyright in America to the effect of digitalisation on the practice of archiving. There’s a lot of information to sort through, and a lot of very helpful leads to follow up on.

But I thought I’d give you a taste of the conversation – which included some real eye-opening revelations.

Read More »

This is about books

Lawrence Lessig discusses the Google Book Search decision. It’s not much of a stretch to imagine the parallels to recorded music. Except to say that Google isn’t even attempting to do this with recorded music…

Matt Mason on opening the vaults

This afternoon, I interviewed Matt Mason, author of the book The Pirate’s Dilemma, about music, culture, law and the public domain.

We talked about all of the music that’s sitting in the vaults, decaying on master tapes – and Matt shared some good ideas about how this situation could be addressed, from a practical and digitally savvy perspective.

These are a couple of choice quotes from that half-hour interview, which was full of interesting insights and parallels from other cultural industries. I’ll go through the interview in more detail when I get a chance, and transcribe bits that I want to use for the book. But as I find these interesting excerpts, I’ll post them up here for you to listen to and discuss.

It was really great to talk to Matt – someone who’s given these matters a great deal of thought – and I can thoroughly recommend his book (here it is at Amazon).

I’ve also just secured an interview with Dr David Sanjek, former director of the BMI archive and now Director of the Centre for Popular Music at the University of Salford. Looking forward to that one too.